Divorce Regulations in Great Britain Research Paper

Divorce Regulations in Great Britain - Research Paper ExampleOne answer no doubt lies in what could be called the spirit of the age. 1963 was, after all, the year in which (according to Philip Larkin) sexual intercourse began. It was also the year of the so-called Profumo affair in which a Minister of the Crown admitted lying to Parliament about his relationship with a woman, and unprecedented call down publicity was given to the surrounding events and rumors. (For example, another Minister was said to indulge in weird sexual practices involving his show naked--save for a mask--at parties.) Lord Dennings exhaustive investigation into these matters (concluding that although there had indeed been orgies where guests indulged in sexual activities of a vile and repelling nature and that it was true dinner had been served by a naked masked man yet there was not a shred of evidence that the man in question was a Minister) did little to calm the fevered atmosphere. In the circumstances, it became increasingly difficult to believe that civilisation would be endangered by allowing the thousands of (often elderly and usually eminently respectable) couples supporting together in what came to be called constant illicit unions to crush the empty legal shell of an earlier marriage so that they could commence in law what they had long been in fact (Castles and Flood, 1991). The massive increase in divorce associated with ...At a somewhat less lofty level, those concerned with the administration of the family justice system became preoccupied with avoiding its collapse under(a) the apparently relentless pressure of divorce petitions. 1But even amongst those who firmly believed the ideal of marriage--in token as a way of providing children the settled and harmonious life on which so much of their future happiness depends --to be the traditionalistic union for better for worse, for richer for poorer . . . till death we do part there was concern about a plenitude of the hundred thousand or more people living apart from their legal spouses in stable unions to which the law denied recognition. The impossibility of legalizing such relationships against the will of an innocent legal spouse denied many men and women (and in particular the children they bore) adequate social and financial protection (Ceschini, 1995).In 1951 in an attempt to meet this concern, Mrs. Eirene White had introduced a close Members Bill into the House of Commons, avowedly intended to deal with marriages in which the spouses have lived separately for seven years, and in which no hitherto recognized ground for divorce exists or in which one partner, having reasonableness for action, declines to take it and keeps the other partner tied against his or her will, generally for life. The Bill did this by invoking a new principle, in that it looks to the breakdown of the marriage as the ground for divorce (whilst not prejudicing the right of an injured party to test divorce under t he animated matrimonial offense provisions). This was to be achieved by adding seven years separation to the existing grounds for divorce.